<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Track Plan Doodling &amp; Layout Name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/12/01/track-plan-doodling-layout-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/12/01/track-plan-doodling-layout-name/</link>
	<description>A Freelance N-Scale Model Railroad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:16:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip H</title>
		<link>http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/12/01/track-plan-doodling-layout-name/comment-page-1/#comment-931</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/?p=798#comment-931</guid>
		<description>SHaun,
Consdidering some of the territory that UP got when it bought MP, tunnels ar enot out o fthe question.  Granted, that would mean modeling Rkansas on one side, not the marshes of St. Tammany Parish, but it would make the tunnels more believable.

In any event, glad you are making progress.  Can&#039;t wait for the first photos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SHaun,<br />
Consdidering some of the territory that UP got when it bought MP, tunnels ar enot out o fthe question.  Granted, that would mean modeling Rkansas on one side, not the marshes of St. Tammany Parish, but it would make the tunnels more believable.</p>
<p>In any event, glad you are making progress.  Can&#8217;t wait for the first photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

