<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Benchwork Mock-up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/08/31/quick-mock-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/08/31/quick-mock-up/</link>
	<description>A Freelance N-Scale Model Railroad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:32:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/08/31/quick-mock-up/comment-page-1/#comment-509</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/?p=727#comment-509</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the reply! I think it is a good idea to keep things simple. I am thinking about building an n scale layout around the walls of the family room. I like to run mainline trains with broad curves. I built a small n scale layout to see how I would like it. To my surprise I really like n scale and plan on sticking with it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reply! I think it is a good idea to keep things simple. I am thinking about building an n scale layout around the walls of the family room. I like to run mainline trains with broad curves. I built a small n scale layout to see how I would like it. To my surprise I really like n scale and plan on sticking with it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/08/31/quick-mock-up/comment-page-1/#comment-502</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 12:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/?p=727#comment-502</guid>
		<description>Hey Josh,

Two reasons for the whole change.

&lt;strong&gt;#1)&lt;/strong&gt; Currently we have 3 bedrooms. Master, Nursery, Guest.  And the &quot;study&quot; which is my layout/computer room.  The wife and I do want to have any child one day, so that means the current guest room would become nursery #2.

We&#039;d still like to have a guest room though for whenever family/friends visit (they all live New Orleans still). So short of  buying a new house down the road, I thought we could redo the study to accommodate a guest bed in there. This whole room change might not happen for at least year, but there was no reason for me to continue work on a layout that would eventually need to come down in the future.  My original thought was that the layout could simply be moved into the garage, but scraped that idea do the hassles you encounter in a garage.

&lt;strong&gt;#2)&lt;/strong&gt;  While I was happy with the layout, I also wasn&#039;t.  The plan just wasn&#039;t going in the direction I wanted.  I really wanted a continuous loop layout so I could &#039;railfan&#039; it and also dabble with automation a little, but ended just &quot;going with the flow&quot; of the room and ended up with a layout with a crazy staging setup.

So with both of these things on my mind, I decided to reduce the layout to a smaller, single level, single scene layout on just the East wall of the room.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Josh,</p>
<p>Two reasons for the whole change.</p>
<p><strong>#1)</strong> Currently we have 3 bedrooms. Master, Nursery, Guest.  And the &#8220;study&#8221; which is my layout/computer room.  The wife and I do want to have any child one day, so that means the current guest room would become nursery #2.</p>
<p>We&#8217;d still like to have a guest room though for whenever family/friends visit (they all live New Orleans still). So short of  buying a new house down the road, I thought we could redo the study to accommodate a guest bed in there. This whole room change might not happen for at least year, but there was no reason for me to continue work on a layout that would eventually need to come down in the future.  My original thought was that the layout could simply be moved into the garage, but scraped that idea do the hassles you encounter in a garage.</p>
<p><strong>#2)</strong>  While I was happy with the layout, I also wasn&#8217;t.  The plan just wasn&#8217;t going in the direction I wanted.  I really wanted a continuous loop layout so I could &#8216;railfan&#8217; it and also dabble with automation a little, but ended just &#8220;going with the flow&#8221; of the room and ended up with a layout with a crazy staging setup.</p>
<p>So with both of these things on my mind, I decided to reduce the layout to a smaller, single level, single scene layout on just the East wall of the room.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/08/31/quick-mock-up/comment-page-1/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 12:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/?p=727#comment-501</guid>
		<description>Decided to go with a 47&quot; track height.  The benchwork will actually be 43&quot; (I found Sievers will custom cut leg heights for you), with 4&quot; risers.   The 47&quot; is right at eye level when sitting, high enough for me when standing to not looking like I&#039;m towering over it, low enough for wife to easily see it, and low enough that it won&#039;t look freakishly tall with the cabinets underneath the layout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Decided to go with a 47&#8243; track height.  The benchwork will actually be 43&#8243; (I found Sievers will custom cut leg heights for you), with 4&#8243; risers.   The 47&#8243; is right at eye level when sitting, high enough for me when standing to not looking like I&#8217;m towering over it, low enough for wife to easily see it, and low enough that it won&#8217;t look freakishly tall with the cabinets underneath the layout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/08/31/quick-mock-up/comment-page-1/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 02:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/?p=727#comment-494</guid>
		<description>I am curious why you tore the old layout down, if you already stated why i apologize!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am curious why you tore the old layout down, if you already stated why i apologize!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/08/31/quick-mock-up/comment-page-1/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 01:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/?p=727#comment-492</guid>
		<description>Yup, the cabinets will remain under the layout.  They&#039;re only 36&quot; tall though.

I grabbed the tape measure this evening and found 52&quot; not to be that bad actually.  My upper level must have been closer to 55.  But being able to sit and see the layout would be nice too :)  I&#039;ll have to grab the tape measure again, heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, the cabinets will remain under the layout.  They&#8217;re only 36&#8243; tall though.</p>
<p>I grabbed the tape measure this evening and found 52&#8243; not to be that bad actually.  My upper level must have been closer to 55.  But being able to sit and see the layout would be nice too <img src='http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   I&#8217;ll have to grab the tape measure again, heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip H</title>
		<link>http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/08/31/quick-mock-up/comment-page-1/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 01:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/?p=727#comment-491</guid>
		<description>Are you planning to keep your recent cabinets? If so, they would provide a ruling height to start from.  Add in any additional workbench capacity you want, and there you have an ideal height.  Plus, if you pick 48 inches, you can railfan sitting down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you planning to keep your recent cabinets? If so, they would provide a ruling height to start from.  Add in any additional workbench capacity you want, and there you have an ideal height.  Plus, if you pick 48 inches, you can railfan sitting down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
