<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Staging Level</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/08/01/the-new-staging-level/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/08/01/the-new-staging-level/</link>
	<description>A Freelance N-Scale Model Railroad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:16:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/08/01/the-new-staging-level/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/?p=558#comment-396</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I wanted to try and blind it in to the rest of layout for now.  Haven&#039;t quite decided if I want to extend the fascia down more to hide it the level yet.  I would cut out a few access holes if I did do that.

Yesterday I did wire up a feeder to the entry track and managed to run a SD70ACe with an autorack through a yard track and around the loop with no problems.  I think the unitrack locking really helps keeping connectivity going throughout the whole level even with just one feeder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I wanted to try and blind it in to the rest of layout for now.  Haven&#8217;t quite decided if I want to extend the fascia down more to hide it the level yet.  I would cut out a few access holes if I did do that.</p>
<p>Yesterday I did wire up a feeder to the entry track and managed to run a SD70ACe with an autorack through a yard track and around the loop with no problems.  I think the unitrack locking really helps keeping connectivity going throughout the whole level even with just one feeder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip H</title>
		<link>http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/08/01/the-new-staging-level/comment-page-1/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/?p=558#comment-395</guid>
		<description>I like the black painted surface.  Something other then plywood, but not prototypical.  sort of helps the staging fade away below the layout.

Have you run it yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the black painted surface.  Something other then plywood, but not prototypical.  sort of helps the staging fade away below the layout.</p>
<p>Have you run it yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/08/01/the-new-staging-level/comment-page-1/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/?p=558#comment-394</guid>
		<description>Yup, it&#039;s all Unitrack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, it&#8217;s all Unitrack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CSXDixieLine</title>
		<link>http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/08/01/the-new-staging-level/comment-page-1/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>CSXDixieLine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 02:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/?p=558#comment-393</guid>
		<description>Looks good--you should be OK on clearance and maintenance should be minimal with the Unitrack (or is that True Track?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks good&#8211;you should be OK on clearance and maintenance should be minimal with the Unitrack (or is that True Track?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/08/01/the-new-staging-level/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 13:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/?p=558#comment-392</guid>
		<description>Top of the staging level to the bottom of the lower deck fascia is about 3&quot;.  Just enough space to get your hands in to work on the track.

Since I&#039;m not really planning on doing much operations or holding operating sessions and the like, my staging is simply a &quot;parking lot&quot; for setup unit trains I&#039;ll run through the layout.  So I wasn&#039;t really concerned about needing to have enough space to hands into the staging level when it&#039;s full of trains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top of the staging level to the bottom of the lower deck fascia is about 3&#8243;.  Just enough space to get your hands in to work on the track.</p>
<p>Since I&#8217;m not really planning on doing much operations or holding operating sessions and the like, my staging is simply a &#8220;parking lot&#8221; for setup unit trains I&#8217;ll run through the layout.  So I wasn&#8217;t really concerned about needing to have enough space to hands into the staging level when it&#8217;s full of trains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rangachari Anand</title>
		<link>http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/08/01/the-new-staging-level/comment-page-1/#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator>Rangachari Anand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 10:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/?p=558#comment-391</guid>
		<description>I have been following your progress for a while now. It looks great but one concern - is the gap on top of the lower staging level too low? I know its N scale but access still seems a bit tight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been following your progress for a while now. It looks great but one concern &#8211; is the gap on top of the lower staging level too low? I know its N scale but access still seems a bit tight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

