<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1 Step Forward, 2 Steps Backwards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/04/22/1-step-forward-2-steps-backwards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/04/22/1-step-forward-2-steps-backwards/</link>
	<description>A Freelance N-Scale Model Railroad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:32:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/04/22/1-step-forward-2-steps-backwards/comment-page-1/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/?p=477#comment-337</guid>
		<description>After considering my options I decided that the only way I&#039;ll replace the track is if I can leave the existing turnouts in place.  I don&#039;t think it&#039;s with the time, effort, and possible additional costs to remove and maybe replace the 5 or 6 turnouts, with possible &quot;tweaking&quot; of the tortoise mounts at each.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After considering my options I decided that the only way I&#8217;ll replace the track is if I can leave the existing turnouts in place.  I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s with the time, effort, and possible additional costs to remove and maybe replace the 5 or 6 turnouts, with possible &#8220;tweaking&#8221; of the tortoise mounts at each.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip H.</title>
		<link>http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/04/22/1-step-forward-2-steps-backwards/comment-page-1/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/?p=477#comment-336</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been laying ME code 55 with wood ties for my secondary and spurs, as wood is protoptypical for my locale.  There is a short section of &quot;main&quot; which mostly serves for photos and car storage, and I kept it as Atlas code 80 flex track (since I had several pieces on hand).  I&#039;ve managed to get good transitions between each by working slowly and carefully, and keeping a few large mill files handy.  I&#039;m going to work on weathering it soon, and I&#039;ll be trying the Floquil Paint Pen method that Cody Grivno used in his MR Cody&#039;s Office segment a few months ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been laying ME code 55 with wood ties for my secondary and spurs, as wood is protoptypical for my locale.  There is a short section of &#8220;main&#8221; which mostly serves for photos and car storage, and I kept it as Atlas code 80 flex track (since I had several pieces on hand).  I&#8217;ve managed to get good transitions between each by working slowly and carefully, and keeping a few large mill files handy.  I&#8217;m going to work on weathering it soon, and I&#8217;ll be trying the Floquil Paint Pen method that Cody Grivno used in his MR Cody&#8217;s Office segment a few months ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/04/22/1-step-forward-2-steps-backwards/comment-page-1/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/?p=477#comment-335</guid>
		<description>Ah, that was going to be a question for you later. If you got the weathered track or not cause I was thinking the same thing about keeping ties clean.

My plan of action would be to first remove the flex track and leave the turnouts in place to see how the ME track lines up them. However, based on your experience the Atlas will be a hair shorter and I may have to pull those up to add some spacers.

I also want to superelevate two additional curves on the lower level near the rock wall. I really like your tape method so I would use that technique to do so.  I used business cards cut into strips for the one curve I did, but it was rather cumbersome to do.

I also plan on leaving the city scene on the upper level as wood ties.  I&#039;ve only put down a little bit of track there so a not huge task to switch to ME if I really like it.  The helix and entry/exit will have to remain Atlas Flex of course.

Thanks for the link too. I saw that on your blog and have it bookmarked to review tonight. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, that was going to be a question for you later. If you got the weathered track or not cause I was thinking the same thing about keeping ties clean.</p>
<p>My plan of action would be to first remove the flex track and leave the turnouts in place to see how the ME track lines up them. However, based on your experience the Atlas will be a hair shorter and I may have to pull those up to add some spacers.</p>
<p>I also want to superelevate two additional curves on the lower level near the rock wall. I really like your tape method so I would use that technique to do so.  I used business cards cut into strips for the one curve I did, but it was rather cumbersome to do.</p>
<p>I also plan on leaving the city scene on the upper level as wood ties.  I&#8217;ve only put down a little bit of track there so a not huge task to switch to ME if I really like it.  The helix and entry/exit will have to remain Atlas Flex of course.</p>
<p>Thanks for the link too. I saw that on your blog and have it bookmarked to review tonight. <img src='http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CSXDixieLine</title>
		<link>http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/04/22/1-step-forward-2-steps-backwards/comment-page-1/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>CSXDixieLine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/?p=477#comment-334</guid>
		<description>Jim Reisling&#039;s BNSF Oakville Sub layout also makes extensive use of the ME concrete tie track on his layout:

http://www.trainboard.com/grapevine/showthread.php?t=99466&amp;highlight=oakville

He is much further along than I am and you can see how beautiful his track looks with some super long trains running on it. One of his newer layout pics is the background wallpaper on my laptop :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim Reisling&#8217;s BNSF Oakville Sub layout also makes extensive use of the ME concrete tie track on his layout:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.trainboard.com/grapevine/showthread.php?t=99466&amp;highlight=oakville" rel="nofollow">http://www.trainboard.com/grapevine/showthread.php?t=99466&amp;highlight=oakville</a></p>
<p>He is much further along than I am and you can see how beautiful his track looks with some super long trains running on it. One of his newer layout pics is the background wallpaper on my laptop <img src='http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CSXDixieLine</title>
		<link>http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/2009/04/22/1-step-forward-2-steps-backwards/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>CSXDixieLine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upmodelrailroad.com/?p=477#comment-333</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good stuff. I ordered the weathered rail in mine because I figured it is not easy to paint the rails without getting paint all over the nice gray ties. With wood ties, you really can&#039;t tell. BTW my upper level will be all wood ties because that is what CSX uses on the Chattanooga sub in TN. Will still be using ME flex for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good stuff. I ordered the weathered rail in mine because I figured it is not easy to paint the rails without getting paint all over the nice gray ties. With wood ties, you really can&#8217;t tell. BTW my upper level will be all wood ties because that is what CSX uses on the Chattanooga sub in TN. Will still be using ME flex for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
